How many of each amenity space should we build, and how do we know?

How many of each amenity space should we build, and how do we know? A demand-driven sizing model for the subject property.
The tower's amenity program was built for a different era of office use. Some spaces sat idle while others were overbooked.
Before redeveloping, ownership engaged REKalibrate to find out which amenities to build, in what mix, and how much of each.
We used a year of reservations from comparable REKalibrate buildings, segmented by industry, to predict demand from this building's tenant mix and population.
De-risk the capex: build the right footprint, sizing and mix of amenities before any money is spent.
Build too little and tenants are turned away at peak; build too much and capital sits idle. There are seven space types, and how much to build has to be answered one type at a time, not with a single across-the-board number. Wellness clusters at midday, golf runs all afternoon, and flex concentrates on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Booking demand, Monday to Friday, 6 AM to 8 PM. Darker means busier. Three of seven space types shown.
Share of leased square footage. General tenant mix makes up the rest of the building.
We tested twelve months of real bookings against both, and the result decides what we forecast from.


Each industry books every space type at its own measured rate, multiplied by session length.
Bar length is predicted booking-hours. Segments are each industry's contribution. These predicted hours drive the space counts in the recommendation.
The count of a tenant's people occupying the building, measured against industry benchmarks.
Each industry books at a measured rate per active profile.
Bookings convert to hours via each space type's session length.
The number needed simultaneously at the peak is how many to build.
Every step is data-derived and auditable. There is no black box.
2
1
1
1
2
1
1Profiles reflect a global attendance-adjusted capacity by industry (a REKalibrate benchmark), not active headcount in the asset. Photos are examples of each space type.
Real usage patterns, per-tenant behavior, and the demand signal behind the sizing model, pulled straight from the platform. These are sample views, shown for illustration, not the full dataset behind the model.
Metrics reflect June 2025 to May 2026.
Top 5 spaces shown, 301.0 hours in total. The remaining 27 hours are spread across 9 smaller spaces. Metrics reflect June 2025 to May 2026.
One view per space type: the per-organization signal and the weekly demand shape behind each recommended count. All views are based on comparable buildings.
Active profiles predict bookings. Demand is concentrated at midday, with peak concurrency of 8.
Active profiles predict bookings. Demand peaks at midday and is lighter on Fridays, with peak concurrency of 4.
Active profiles predict bookings. Demand builds through the afternoon, with peak concurrency of 4.
Strong active-profiles fit, with R² of 0.93 for Professional Services. Busy all afternoon into early evening, with peak concurrency of 3.
Active profiles predict bookings. Steady afternoon demand, with peak concurrency of 4.
Active profiles predict bookings. Demand is weighted to Tuesday and Wednesday with longer blocks, and peak concurrency of 3.
Hardest to predict from headcount alone. Demand concentrates on Tuesday and Wednesday with long event blocks, and peak concurrency of 5.
Want to learn more about how we help teams measure Engagement and better understand retention? Reach out and let's chat.
Without measurement, improvement is guesswork. REKalibrate makes measurement possible—and improvement inevitable.

Track customer engagement across amenities
Analyze workspace usage and trends
Assess renewal risk with real data
